Nov 27, 2024 at 11:38am
Begin preparing now for the March 8th SAT.
Nov 24, 2024 at 9:15pm
Nov 24, 2024 at 8:02pm
Nov 24, 2024 at 7:24pm
HF602- FT Nanny for Infant (Jan Start)
Nov 27, 2024 at 10:59am
BF604- PT Nanny for Infant (Jan Start)
Nov 26, 2024 at 5:12pm
LSF504- PT Nanny for Infant (Jan start)
Nov 26, 2024 at 3:54pm
MF1100-2- PT 3 day/week Nanny for Infant (ASAP (or early Jan) start)
Nov 26, 2024 at 11:43am
Live In Nanny Needed Asap (Great Pay)
Nov 25, 2024 at 4:38am
Exciting part time opportunity with a start-up
Nov 24, 2024 at 9:22am
Promote your business here - Businesses get highlighted throughout the site and you can add a deal.
Worse - are we really talking sending librarians to jail??
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/jan/16/missouri-could-jail-librarians-for-lending-age-inappropriate-books-parental-oversight-of-public-libraries-bill
Sorry, I couldn’t work out if this is purely a political issue or a wider issue affecting society at large.
If the current situation is that young readers generally aren’t permitted access to unsuitable (graphic, explicit, violent etc) content, why are people creating a new ruckus? (Well, yeah, public funding) If the current situation allows certain more progressive families to shepherd their growing children through the Ratings minefield as they browse and borrow, why is that a problem?
And why should the librarians bear the brunt of punishment for a family’s decision?? Especially when the profession’s code of practice insists on encouraging ethical open Stanards?